Nudge
Posted in One to Ponder on January 21st, 2010 by Admin
We all know that most purchase decisions we make are not driven by purely rational thought processes. That generally, we make decisions based on our emotions and then seek to rationalise the purchase afterwards. (Anyone who’s ever spent £200 on a pair of shoes or bought a 50” TV knows this to be true). Which is why planners are getting really excited about the discovery of ‘behavioural economics’ (old-ish hat in academia), which offers empirical evidence into how people really go about making decisions. IPA president Rory Sutherland sees spreading the word as one of his single most important tasks whilst in office. He cites the example from behavioural economics bible Nudge, in which the economist authors came up with a more insightful and successful solution than the advertising agency. Using the concept of “loss aversion”, they created a pension plan where investors signed up for a pension that only deducted money from their earnings when they received a pay rise. By ensuring that the saver never witnessed a reduction in their disposable income, the plan was both brilliant and highly effective: pension contributions among this group increased by 200%. There is no reason why an agency couldn’t have come up with this strategy. We simply need to embrace the power and value of greater human understanding.
We live in a hectic world. Making informed and rational decisions for all purchases is nigh on impossible so we use a variety of heuristics, approximate rules of thumb, and cognitive and perceptive biases to simplify the decision-making process and allow time for all the stuff in life that happens in between buying things. By better understanding these psychological and behavioural shortcuts, we can begin to truly understand how our customers make decisions, help simplify the process, and maximise the impact and effectiveness of our communications.
Thanks to Dan Broadwood. Dan can’t smell in France.

The ad industry stands accused of being responsible for much of the planet’s environmental and social problems. A story in
Milton Friedman famously said, “The business of business is business”. So why are big brands queuing up to help Haiti? Are they genuine good neighbours, or just jumping on the help-Haiti bandwagon? Who cares, if the result is positive. Here are some of the ways they’re helping. In response to requests from relief agencies, Google has released a new layer on Google Earth showing pre/post earthquake satellite images. Google has also set up a person-finder service (and donated $1m to relief agencies). Zynga, the games developer behind MafiaWars and FarmVille, has over 40m daily users. By integrating donation into the gameplay, Zynga has so far raised over $1.2m and counting to the UN Food Programme There are already dozens of ways to donate online, but Apple has made it made it one-click easy by allowing donation through iTunes.
M&C Saatchi is the latest agency to recognise the importance of being represented in South Africa, setting up shops in Johannesburg and Cape Town,
Reading pubescent and dead serious thoughts on love and annoying Mums from your teenage diary in front of an audience could possibly be some people’s worst nightmare, but a growing number of sane, Grazia-reading women are doing it voluntarily for their Friday night fun. It all started when Sarah Brown, a writer from Brooklyn, unearthed her old diaries at her parents’ house, and decided it would be a good idea to share the most embarrassing excerpts with her friends via a weekly email. This then evolved into a sell-out open mic
We’re expecting something a bit different from the usual superficial celebrity endorsement with the announcement that Lady Gaga will become creative director for Polaroid (more accurately, a special line of their products). With Gaga, nothing is ever straightforward and as a proposition in herself, she is the triumph of style, with just enough substance to keep us preoccupied. What Lady Gaga and her management have realised, is that to maintain global stardom one must provide continual eye candy. Her music – safe, unoriginal euro electro – just about justifies her place in the charts, but her fashion sense is what keeps the public eye gazing. Gaga’s constant shape-shifting is a lesson learned from the ultimate chameleon and brand icon Madonna. Indeed, just making music is not enough. In the 21st Century what matters more than when selling records is the style, not the substance.
Italy has created an interesting market where money is banned. The 