Anti-Trust
Posted in Digital on November 12th, 2010 by admin2
Young people take the Internet for granted but most don’t understand how it works. It’s the primary place where young people form beliefs about the world and gives them unprecedented access to learning, knowledge and information. But it also bombards them with equally large amounts of propaganda, user-generated nonsense, conspiracy theories and misinformation. Separating the wheat from the chaff is difficult – new survey data shows just how bad young people in the UK are at doing this. More 16-24 year olds trust the net than newspapers; 43% of them base their trust in web content on ‘how the site looks’, while 32% of 12-15 year olds believe that Google search results are listed in order of accuracy. “Online, image really is everything. Young people are swimming in a sea of information and misinformation but they don’t make the same judgment calls that older generations do,” says Jamie Bartlett, head of the violence and extremism programme at Demos. “It’s hard to claim there is such a thing as ‘informed choice’ anymore as there’s just too much information. In a world where conspiracy theories are as trusted national newspapers, building a narrative that can claim to be the ‘truth’ will be the ultimate goal.”
Our attention spans didn’t die they just changed shape, according to new thinking from social media guru
The Crimson Blood Wolf Pack is a furry-tail-wearing, mall-cruising gang of teenage girls from Texas. The girls have banded together around an Alpha Female they call Wolfie, 18-year-old Sara Rodriguez who claims to be part wolf. Discovered and captured on film by photographer Danielle Levitt, the gang hit the local headlines this year when their leader, Wolfie, was accused of killing and beheading a dog after photographs appeared online. Whilst she explains in 
Tags. To many they’re seen as the lowest form of graffiti, artless and mindless vandalism. But to writers tags are so much more. They’re the core of who a writer is – what their name is, where they’re from, what their style is, what crew they represent. Unreadable to most observers, they are loaded with information for other writers. Ironic then that what once existed as an esoteric flag decipherable only to the initiated has a namesake that has democratised graffiti and moved it from dark streets and train yards to homes all across the world. Online tags on sites such as Flickr has completely changed the face of graffiti. Before the internet, respect and fame in graff was garnered through being ‘up’ (having your tags or pieces all over the place, making them unmissable), which involved lots of long nights walking the streets and train tracks. But it’s now possible for writers to take their work directly to people by tagging it on any number of websites. Less legwork, less risk and a bigger audience. A name in graff can now be made practically overnight with relatively little effort on the part of the writer. Although this technology has taken graffiti to new audiences and made some writers well known names, the hardcore graff community remains sceptical. Truly respected names are built the old-fashioned way – by putting the work in.
His master’s #shamelesslywhoring on Twitter not withstanding, if you’re not already dabbling in The Fry Chronicles, here’s one great reason to fall in love with Stephen Fry all over again. Adding to the debate around the future of books in their printed form, myFry is 

Once, when someone died, we tended their memories tangibly – by laying flowers on a grave or visiting the site where ashes were scattered. For the “Facebook Generation”, the dead are not just remembered online, they’re silent partners in an ongoing, virtually uninterrupted dialogue. Friends and family are happy to tend to the social network pages of the dead, leaving messages and posting pictures. There is also a new breed of “online memorial” sites such as 