According to Antidote, a blog on all things social by Mother Strategist Jon Miller, people often describe charity Amnesty International as a ‘bit of a cult’. In research, they’re described as ‘aloof’, ‘insular’, ‘closed’. You would suspect that Amnesty’s natural response would be to shift perception towards more acceptable modern values ‘transparency and inclusiveness’. But Jon poses the question – could being a ‘bit cult’ be a good thing? Noting that after all the research shows Amnesty is a bit cool too, and in fact it’s an attractive brand. An article called Why cults seduce suggests there are four key features to consider when it comes to cults. Firstly ‘Boundaries’ – you are either in or out, the bigger the barrier the more passionate the solidarity. Then ‘Initiation’ – you have to earn your right to belong. Next ‘Customs’ – those that bind you to the group. And finally ‘ideology’ – cults have a strong central ideology that fosters alignment and clarity. The article talks abou what marketing can learn from cults, and gives Apple as an example: the brand invented its own customs, interfaces, rituals and principles, and even has a founder/leader-figure. The early advertising read “Macintosh. A religion, a way of life.” Of course that was ten years ago, and Apple’s dreams have come true: it’s no longer a cult, but a global corporate religion. Apple took on the Microsoft Empire, just like the cult of Christianity took on the Roman Empire – and became the Catholic Church. Perhaps it’s a good lesson: stay true to your counter-culture values, and become the new mainstream. So what about Amnesty International? The truth is, Amnesty is a bit of a cult. It has a clear ideology: to protect the human, to demand justice. It has a clear approach: ordinary people standing up for human rights. It even has the semi religious iconography. And Amnesty can learn from Apple: the best way of appealing to the mainstream is to stay true to your own story – everything follows from there.
Read more »